When first reading How Soccer
Explains the World by Franklin Foer, I immediately was reminded of the
movie Green Street Hooligan’s. Although the movie is based in and on London
soccer, it touches upon the history between soccer rivals and the gruesome behavior
just like Foer does. But in Foer’s book, he exemplifies how the relationship
between rivals coincides with globalization and how it works.
Throughout the book, Foer touches
upon race and ethnicity, off and on the soccer field. The connection he leads
from that to globalization is almost one you can make yourself by reading. In
Chapter 2, Foer talks about the rivalry between the Rangers and the Celtics,
leading all the way back to religion. He talks about the gruesome chants,
murders and overall history, between the rivals. The rivalry is almost
something they thrive off of individually and as a whole. This rivalry and overall belief in their cultures and religions, exemplifies what each country in the market feels and succeeds by. As noted in the
chapter, “even in the global market, they draw supporters who crave ethnic
identification” continuing to suggest that “if they lost their extremist
sloganeering, they’d lose money. This right here, explained to me how
globalization worked. Since these teams and fans live for their culture, their
religion, their race, their ethnicity and are so passionate about it, it
creates good business in the global market. Why try to globalize and be civil
with the other country or in Foer’s case the rival soccer team, when you can
gain more fans that want to live and fight for who and what they are. Although, we outsource as a nation, the United States is striving to be more USA made and keep jobs within the country for our economy. Just like many soccer teams will not trade players because they need them to win games.
Foer then discusses the Great
Depression and the effects it had on Scotland. Because of the limited jobs and
bad economy, the “religious scapegoating” kicked in and the relationship
between the Celtics and Rangers really began to be dangerous. Since the shipbuilding industry plummeted
because of Germany and American surging, the negatives of globalization were
apparent.
All in all, this book exemplifies
how soccer explains the globalized war after war, race and religion struggles.
The perspective Foer uses to show you in a simplified manner what globalization
is, is very fascinating. I believe in all of his examples in regards to soccer.
When a team recruits outside their country because they need better talent, it
promotes key concepts of globalization such as, outsourcing to other countries
that are more efficient and cultural diversity in the market (or team). After reading this book and watching that movie many years ago, I believe Foer makes many key points about how soccer truly explains the world of globalization and diversity.
I understand why having such loyal fans is good for business and generates economic prosperity, but I don't think that arbitrary, meaningless violence is necessarily a justification for doing so. Having violent fans like these two teams draws people who may not be that may not be as enthusiastic away. It alienates a number of people and puts a cap on the number of people that can participate. Violence immediately turns away anybody who wants to go and enjoy a soccer game without being violent. Although it creates uber-loyal fans, it does a significant amount of harm to the economy as well.
ReplyDeleteAnalyzing the actions of the fans, the actual people, in response to globalization, I think is very important, and is often glanced over. In a globalized world where, major wars and conflicts will hopefully not happen as much, fan violence and extreme sport team loyalty I believe can be a reaction to the lack of warfare which could be used to distract the populace. The intense rivalries discussed by Foer, the mob mentality, the mafia influence, which did occur before globalization took off, in the latter half of the 21st century, has grown as sports have become an easy medium for divisive cultural issues and political movements to be linked to-especially as armed engagement is becoming harder and harder to legitimize. Hopefully as the world continues to open up, the perspectives of fans will grow and change, as well, to include tolerance and more respect.
ReplyDeleteLike you said, extremely loyal fans to the soccer teams helps with the economy and nationalism but the violence those fans create is the biggest issue. The violence may be from retaliation from political issues. I believe that a soccer team would have more beneficial gains if the violence decreased. If violent fans became less normal, it would open up soccer gains to a wider range of the population and people would still have pride in their country’s team and have economic and business gains.
ReplyDelete